Canada’s First Hybrid Corporations Launch in B.C.
Accelerating Social Impact among the first registered community contribution companies

Accelerating Social Impact CCC Ltd. was registered today as one of British Columbia’s first community contribution companies (CCC), a new recognized hybrid corporation structure in Canada.

Registration for CCCs opened this morning (July 29) as a government response to an emerging demand for socially focused investment options. The hybrid corporation structure aims to bridge the gap between for-profit companies and nonprofit organizations.

Accelerating Social Impact seeks to serve as an information source and intermediary for the range of social impact through blended-value business and financing options. As its name indicates, the corporation’s purpose is to accelerate this emerging environment.

David LePage, Scott Hughes, John Kay and Jim Fletcher are Accelerating Social Impact’s board members and represent the array of potential engagement in activities from nonprofits, private sector, co-ops and various investors.

Having worked in different areas around social finance, commercial planning or social enterprise the board members have realized a huge gap exists between demand and supply when it comes to investors and people looking to get ready for investments.

“We feel there’s an intermediary role that’s really missing,” says David, founding Accelerating Social Impact board member and shareholder.

Scott has been a social finance practitioner for more than a decade. As principal of CapacityBuild Consulting Inc. he supports mission-based organizations in business planning and financial strategies.

The current organizational structures in Canada present a challenge due to the lack of flexibility around combining philanthropic with market-based funding for combined mission and financial outcomes, says Scott.

Accelerating Social Impact has the opportunity to be a catalyst in promoting innovation in organizational structure while providing needed supports and services to assist mission-based organizations, says Scott.

“I am really excited about the possibilities for Accelerating Social Impact to become a centre for innovation in supporting social finance capacity and transactions in B.C.,” he adds.
 
Being a “first out of the gate” CCC has benefits in bringing attention to this new structure, notes Scott, as they can speak about what is required to establish this type of corporation that is among the tools to further the capacity of the province’s social finance sector.

John, CEO of Realize Co-op, says he is excited to be one of the first CCCs that is up and running.

“I love experiments, I love new challenges, so for me this is a great opportunity to try out a new model that has never been done before in Canada and to experiment with a new corporate form, one that is very different than what we have traditionally had,” says John.

CCCs have the ability to issue shares and pay dividends to shareholders and must follow rules to ensure the majority of their projects and assets are directed towards a social purpose.

“This new model will unlock new ways to generate meaningful, local employment in B.C. and generate economic wealth for our province by encouraging private investment in B.C.’s social enterprise sector,” says Finance Minister Michael de Jong in a news statement.

Accelerating Social Impact will be developing a full business plan over the next three to six months.

You can comment below, or e-mail jennifer(at)axiomnews.ca.

A version of this article was originally written for the Enterprising Non-profits Canada news service. This repost, for which we received permission, follows the style guidelines of the original post. To learn more about generative newsroom options for your organization or community, please contact peter(at)axiomnews.ca.

Permalink

I'm wondering. If I wanted to incorporate as a CCC would I have to move my organization from Ontario to BC?

Permalink

 

1 . That missing intermediary role in the bottom up perspective:

 In skillbase it has existed for some time in the not-for-profit management skill involved in social program development operating in  an "equality" expectation versus the present " equity" (fairness) perspective.

This switch to “ equity” has culled the flock and narrowed the arena.

The audience ( client) is waiting for action.

 

  2. That missing intermediary role in the top down perspective:

Considering the best use of the $ as the bottom line:

  • the 4th biggest carrot for private partner is the rebate for the successful proof of viable employment /job creation
  • the 3rd carrot is for educators in the emergence of sustainability studies at college and uni levels accepting service and workplace learning as viable options
  •  the 2nd carrot is the tax haven with a mere 7% of profits to programs
  •  the 1st is the international “trading “ advantage of social impact bonds .

  The switch to P3 sector ( public, private and voluntary) encompasses everyone as long as the voluntary sector is positioned as partner ( not merely manager)

  This switch to “ civil society” goodness has clustered the flock and broadened the arena

   The provider is waiting for action ( at every level )..... 

   3. The intermediary role that beings the issues of 1. and 2.together?

Is it the missing viable “program”. that serves the cluster of clients ?   No.

Is it the missing “ project” that clusters programs?   Partly

Is it the missing “ model” that ensures the selection fits the larger purposes?    Yes

The” model” IS the missing intermediary. Without it there is nothing viable to manage..