Blog > Peter Pula
Appreciating David Cooperrider
The first time I met David Cooperrider I shared how Appreciative Inquiry helped us understand why Generative Journalism was creating constructive change for our clients, and how it deepened our practice. We’ve been framing our inquires and stories with the help of AI for over 10 years. In that moment he invited me to write a chapter in an upcoming book. His readiness to expand the circle and be inclusive was inspiring.
In years since David has supported ongoing storytelling as an element of post-summit infrastructure. In Cincinnati I was stunned by his ability to allow a design team of 50 or so people to completely stall and stay in their inquiry. I thought I was watching a disaster. I asked David if a change of strategy might be in order: rather than coming up with a system-changing calling question, maybe we ought to start with enlivening the independent strengths in the room. While pensively watching the room struggle he shared with me how a community needs a point outside of its current reality to bring those strengths into motion and collaboration. We’ve been conscious of the use of ‘points outside the system’ in our inquiries ever since.
Over lunch one day, a day in which David was incredibly generous with his time, we were discussing the work of discovering strengths in people, organizations and systems as an approach to constructive journalism. He said, it’s about even more than discovering strengths these days, it’s about discovering where the energy is in a system. Another clinker. Where is the energy in the system? In this story? In our inquiries and questions?
We’re no United Nations, we are a small firm focussed on grassroots stories. David has made his mark even in the small places like this one and he’s done so directly.
When I heard that Champlain College was opening a centre for Appreciative Inquiry I couldn’t help but be appreciative.
You can comment on this blog below, or e-mail peter(at)axiomnews.com.
Comment on, share or print this story:
Peter is the Founder of Axiom News. He has also founded and led a community newspaper and a corporate communications agency. He has served as a member and chairperson on the boards and committees of children's services, schools, municipal grants, arts, and local exchange organizations.
Peter led the discovery, founding, and practice of Generative Journalism as a healing and community art.
He has been invited to host workshops in Canada, Europe, and the United States on the practice of Generative Journalism, an open communications approach for emergent and constructive change in organizations, networks, and communities.
To bring dialogic and narrative arts together Peter and Axiom News initiated the Peterborough Dialogues in 2015. Over 150 deep dialogues, circles of trust, working circles, and summits have been held in Peterborough, Ontario to cultivate citizen-led community co-creation with beautiful results. The Peterborough Dialogues continues to be a rich practice field delivering up daily insights into the power of community convening.
Peter continues to integrate convening, journalism, and narrative arts practices to hold space for community to heal and for citizens to take the lead in creating the community of their dreams.
In 2015, the year Axiom News gave birth to the Peterborough Dialogues, over 100 gatherings were hosted. I was asked by an astounded colleague in Europe, why would anyone do that? Well, to know and to serve. That’s why.
We have become so remarkably accustomed to a form of leadership that comes from the top. Why? Well, because it is easier for everybody. It is easier for the leader because they can indulge in their narcissism. And, well, we want them to. You see, if they are shaping things according to their filters and persona then we can move in a direction that is embodied by the leader.
One has to wonder if the results of the Brexit referendum are an answer to a question other than the one on the ballot. Being in inquiry most of my life I’ve had many, many experiences where the question asked isn’t quite the one answered.
I've been thinking about what is it I believe is the essence of hosting. Intention and Ownership — that makes all the difference.
Deep democracy, as we refer to it, comes down to the basic idea that each one of us is inescapably responsible for creating, or trying to create, the workplace, community, society, economy, and political climate in which we live. That responsibility does not lie ‘elsewhere’ or with ‘them’ — it lies with us and how we interact and co-create.
As we create third spaces we also create spaces between spaces. Which seem to hold the most potential for life to thrive. Working within institutions and silos to create change seems, by contrast to working in the spaces in between, to be very, very limiting and difficult. Some of the same processes we have been using in institutions might be far better put to work, liberated even, by using them between institutions.
Culture will eat strategy for lunch – and stories shape culture. This article, Building a Storytelling Culture, by Julie Dixon points out that most of us agree our organizations and communities should develop a storytelling culture but that knowing what to do about it is a bit dicier.